Legal Opinion
Aetna Insurance v. Poole & Kent Co.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided March 6, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 68-218PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ATKINS, District Judge.
It is rare that opposing parties in a lawsuit can reach complete agreement in the facts involved. In the case sub judioe, both parties have signified such agreement in their motions for summary judgment. The Court concurs in such procedure as the facts are well established and only the legal issue remains.
Briefly, the situation is as follows; Defendant is a general contractor which entered into an agreement with a subcontractor. After substantial performance the subcontractor walked off the job, having received a number of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Union Indemnity Co. v. City of New SmyrnaSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Midtown Bank of Miami v. The Travelers Indemnity Company, the Travelers Indemnity Company v. Riverside BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
3Cited by1 opinion
- Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Barnett Bank of Marion County, NADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988