Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Richards v. Foust

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 4, 1990No. 89-2083PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.

Dane County District Attorney C. William Foust appeals from a judgment denying his motion to quash an alternative writ of mandamus. The trial court issued the alternative writ on Harlan Richards' petition. Richards' petition alleged that Foust had denied his request under Wisconsin's public records law, secs. 19.31-.39, Stats., to inspect the prosecutor's closed case file in the criminal action State v. Richards, case No. 84 CF 344.

The central issue is whether there is a common law exception prohibiting disclosure of a prosecutor's closed case files under Wisconsin's public records law. We…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Youmans v. OwensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Newspapers, Inc. v. BreierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Hathaway v. Joint School District No. 1Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. Swan v. Elections BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Beckon v. EmeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Richards v. FoustWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State Ex Rel. Richards v. FoustWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API