Lomax v. Shaw
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Judge.
This appeal raises the issue of whether a Superior Court judge has the authority to impose sanctions striking the defendants’ answer when the defendants renege on an agreement to settle the dispute. The case was removed from the trial calendar based upon counsels’ representations in open court that the case had been settled.
Plaintiffs filed this dram shop action on 7 June 1988. Defendants filed an answer in response to plaintiffs’ claims. The case was calendared for a trial on 23 October 1989.
On 23 October 1989, counsel for both parties announced to the trial judge that the case…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Forman & Zuckerman, P. A. v. SchupakCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pinney v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Few v. Hammack Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. KeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- In re J.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Baxley v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.