Legal Opinion

Purvis v. Frink

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1908PublishedCited by 8 opinions

This case was decided by Division B. Appeal from the Circuit for Columbia County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

—Appellee Talulah H. Frink hied her bill against the appellants in the circuit court of Columbia county seeking to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the payment of a note for $700.00, both note and mortgage' executed 'by Sarah Baxley in her lifetime, to the appellee. Defendants hied a plea setting up that the transaction was usurious and a plea of part payment.

The following petition was also hied by apppellants for a change of venue: “And now come the defendants by A. J. Henry, their solicitor, and state that they fear that they cannot have a fair and impartial trial of the said cause in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williams v. RoblesSupreme Court of Florida · 1886

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Suarez v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  2. Evans v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Pervis v. FrinkSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  4. Theo. Hirsch Co. v. McDonald Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1927
  5. Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API