Legal Opinion

Padaigis v. Kane

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 7, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff sued upon a note for $5000, the defendant pleaded a general denial, and the trial court gave judgment for the plaintiff to recover the amount of the note with interest. Two days later, during the same term of court, the defendant made a motion to open the judgment in order to enable her to offer further evidence and to file an amendment to the answer specially pleading lack of consideration for the note. The trial court opened the judgment but did not then give permission for the filing of the special defense. Some time later it was filed but under what circumstances the record…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoard v. Sears Roebuck Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  2. Ideal Financing Association v. LabonteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Simpson v. Young Men's Christian Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ral Management, Inc. v. Valley View AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Sasso v. AleshinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  4. Milford Trust Co. v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  5. Prospect Realty, Inc. v. BishopConnecticut Superior Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API