Legal Opinion

Cipriani v. Cipriani

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1965PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbraham N. Geller, J.

The letter of defendant’s attorneys dated January 5, 1965 is treated ¡as an application for reargument and the letter of plaintiff’s attorney dated January 14, 1965 as the response thereto. The court adheres to its determination.

The question as to whether a wife shows probability of success in obtaining a matrimonial decree in her favor is no longer the criterion for awarding or denying temporary alimony. That clearly appears from the provision in section 236 of the Domestic Relations Law, in effect September 1, 1963, which deals with alimony, temporary or permanent, that a direction therefor…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hyman v. HymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Brownstein v. BrownsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  3. Hinden v. HindenNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Nobel v. NobelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. Sacks v. SacksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API