Wilkerson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
LATTIMORE, Judge.
Appellant advances several propositions. In the able argument in support of his motion, it is contended that the evidence does not support the allegation of ownership of the burned property, in appellant. The proof sufficiently showed appellant to be the occupant of said house, in actual care, control and management of same at the time. There is some suggestion in the testimony that the loss claim was made in the name of appellant’s wife. In either event the allegation of ownership in appellant was proper, and met by the proof. In Pinckard v. State, 62…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kennedy v. UpshawTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Smyth v. CaswellTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Wyley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Wimberly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Wagoner v. RuplyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.