Legal Opinion

Kreinson v. Commercial National Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 12, 1936No. Appeal, 250PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

The purpose of the bill was to obtain an accounting of a partnership and a declaration of plaintiff’s rights in partnership assets on the theory of a constructive trust. The learned court below thought that jurisdiction was in the orphans’ court and for that reason dismissed the bill on preliminary objections under Equity Buies 48 and 49. In reviewing the record at this stage of the proceeding we must of course assume that the plaintiff will prove the facts alleged.

Jacob Kreinson and his brother Louis conducted' a general store in Bradford, Pennsylvania, under the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Russell v. . McCallNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Penn v. FoglerIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Weigley v. Coffman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1891
  4. Froess v. FroessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Brown's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nichols v. ElkinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  2. Spivak v. BronsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Moffett v. PeirceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Del Conte v. Luca, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1954
  5. Nicholson's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Montgomery County · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API