Legal Opinion

Dinerstein v. Shapiro

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 21, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Order unanimously reversed upon the law, with costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff for the amount sued for, with appropriate costs in the court below.

There was no error in receiving the evidence that was eventually stricken out. Proof of the award, itself, could have been given. (Wood v. Tunnicliff, 74 N. Y. 38, at p. 46; Keen v. Batshore, 1 Esp. 194; 170 Eng. Rep., Full Reprint, 325; Nisi Prius, book 1; Slack v. Buchannan, Peake, 6; 170 Eng. Rep. 59; Kingston v. Phelps, Peake, 299; 170 Eng. Rep. 163; 5 C. J. p. 168, § 412.) The parties had agreed to arbitrate. This required no writing.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New York Lumber & Wood Working Co. v. SchniederNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Wood v. . TunnicliffNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. French v. . NewNew York Court of Appeals · 1863

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rubman v. LewinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API