Legal Opinion

Cohee v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 2, 1997No. F-96-329Published

1ConcurrenceLane, Judge

I concur in the majority’s resolution of the issue before this Court in proposition one. The issue of whether jurors may take notes with them into deliberations has been properly decided by condemning the dicta in Glazier. However, I would add to the opinion by requiring that jurors’ notes be destroyed at the conclusion of the trial so that the notes may not be used to impeach the jury’s verdict. See 12 O.S.1991, § 2606.

I also agree with many of the concerns expressed by Judge Lumpkin in his separate vote. However, I write specially to voice my own concerns regarding the “Guidelines Governing…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. Allen v. District Court of Washington CountyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Cohee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API