Legal Opinion

Soto v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 3, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Kraus Maintenance, Inc., Herman I. Kraus, Kraus Enterprises, Inc., 236-1 Development Corp., and Krause Management, Inc., appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated March 11, 2003, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them, and granted the plaintiffs cross motion to compel them to produce a certain witness for a deposition.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lowenthal v. Theodore H. Heidrich Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Devine v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Simmons v. GuthrieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Connecticut Indemnity Co. v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API