Legal Opinion

United States v. Morrisdale Coal Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 21, 1942No. 337PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

The condition of the bond upon which this action was'brought is somewhat unusual. It is, “* * * if the principal shall * * * duly pay any part of such tax found by the Commissioner to be due, with interest * * *, and shall otherwise well, and truly perform and observe all the provisions of law and the regulations, then the obligation is to be void * *

If “found by the Commissioner to be due” applies to “such tax” then the principal could by paying one dollar (“any part”) of it, discharge the whole obligation of the surety. This meaning is, of course, absurd.

If…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Young v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  2. Nazareth Foundry & Machine Co. v. Marshall Machinery & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Noble v. Cope's AdministratorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Morrisdale Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API