Legal Opinion

Star Woolen Company v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 7, 1962No. 51-61PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITAKER, Judge.

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.

In its petition plaintiff sets out this portion of the terms and conditions of the proposed contract submitted with the invitation for bids:

“Inspection: Bidders are invited and urged to inspect the property to be sold prior to submitting bids. Property will be available for inspection at the places and times specified in the Invitation * *

It then alleges:

“ * * * When the said representative of petitioner arrived to inspect the goods, defendant made available for inspection only one (1) unit or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Whiteside v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Sachs Mercantile Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  4. Lyman Brightman Newman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  5. Newman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. J. G. Watts Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. California-Pacific Utilities Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  3. Montreal Securities, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. American Auto Parts Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API