Hammond v. Stamps.com, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GORSUCH, Circuit Judge.
The Class Action Fairness Act promises a federal forum for proposed class actions if (among other things) the amount “in controversy” exceeds $5 million. 28 U.S.C, § 1332(d)(2). But though it has made appearances in many and even pretty ancient federal jurisdictional statutes, the term “in controversy” remains a source of dispute for the parties before us and gives rise to this appeal. Affording the phrase its traditional meaning, we find federal jurisdiction here beyond doubt.
The case comes to us this way. In exchange for a monthly subscription fee, Stamps.com lets…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- McPhail v. Deere & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Delores Lewis v. Verizon Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Brian Hartis v. Chicago Title Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Spivey v. Vertrue, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Sabrina Roppo v. Travelers Commercial InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Donna Schutte v. Ciox Health, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- State ex rel. Peterson v. Creative Comm. PromotionsNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
- Becher v. United Healthcare Servs., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2019
- Abraham v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.