Legal Opinion · Dissent

Thornton v. F.J. Cherry Hospital

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided May 8, 2006No. I.C. NO. TA-17480Published

1Dissent

I believe that the majority has erred in its application of the law of negligence to the facts of the present case. Because I believe that Defendant negligently breached its duty to protect Plaintiff from harming himself, I respectfully dissent.

Plaintiff was involuntarily committed to Defendant Cherry Hospital as a danger to himself on May 16, 2000, after cutting his own head, chest, and legs extensively with a box cutter in the hope of receiving narcotic painkillers for his injuries. After commitment to Defendant hospital, Plaintiff made repeated efforts to obtain narcotic painkillers from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davis v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Bermuda Run Country Club, Inc. v. AtwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API