Legal Opinion

Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. Dixon

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Marvin E. Segal, J.

By order dated January 24, 1994 the court granted petitioner’s application for an order pursuant to CPLR 7503 permanently staying the arbitration of respondent’s underinsured motorist claim, only to the extent that arbitration was temporarily stayed for a period of 45 days after service of a copy of the order upon petitioner’s attorney. Pursuant to Huth v Nationwide Ins. Co. (148 Misc 2d 1003) and the public policy underlying the promulgation of Insurance Department Regu*88lotion 35-D (11 NYCRR subpart 60-2 et seq.), the petitioner was afforded the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Huth v. Nationwide InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In re the Arbitration between CNA Insurance & GrandstaffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. In re Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API