Legal Opinion

Escobedo v. Oleisky

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 19, 1983No. C1-83-1284PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner is a juvenile who was certified for prosecution as an adult on charges of criminal damage to property and trespass to a motor vehicle. Petitioner pleaded guilty to the charges and was sentenced by the trial court to consecutive jail terms of 90 days for each offense. The trial court refused to give petitioner credit for time spent in the juvenile detention center awaiting certification for prosecution as an adult. Minn.R.Crim.P. 27.03, subd. 4(b), provides credit for “all time spent in custody in connection with the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. Ervin ThomasMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. State v. DaFonsecaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. State v. BonafideCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Ex Parte GreenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Ex Parte GreenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API