Legal Opinion
(PC) Perez v. Smith
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 2, 2022No. 1:20-cv-00840Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SANDRO S. PEREZ, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00840-DAD-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 13 v. ) FOR SANCTIONS AND/OR EXPENSES 14 A, SMITH, et al., ) (ECF No. 48) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) 17 Plaintiff Sandro S. Perez is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for sanctions, filed November 10, 2021. 20 (ECF No. 48.) 21 I. 22 BACKGROUND 23 This action is proceeding against…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Ann J. Malone v. United States Postal Service, an Agency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Henderson v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.