Legal Opinion

Hamre v. Rothschild Company

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1925No. 19236. En BancPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

— The plaintiff was injured while working for the defendant. The ship on which he was working .was at a wharf in Seattle, and was t.o be loaded with bulk wheat to be carried to a distant port. In order that the cargo would not shift to one side and thus endanger the ship’s safety, it was necessary that a bulkhead or a wooden partition be put in the hold of the vessel. It was to be located at about the middle of the ship and to run the entire length of the hold. It was to be held in place by means of 6x6 pieces. These braces were to be in tiers. They had to be of different lengths so as" to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lewinn v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Metzler v. McKenzieWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Swanson v. Sound Construction & Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Eckert v. Sound Construction & Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Parker v. Pantages Theater Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Kahlstrom v. International Stevedoring Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API