Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Jackson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1987No. A033980PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WHITE, P. J.

Appellants James Andrew Jackson (James) and Marvin Ray Jackson (Marvin) were convicted by a jury of burglary. (Pen. Code, § 459.) In a bifurcated proceeding, the trial court found that each had committed the offense while released from custody on bail pending trial on an earlier felony offense, in violation of section 12022.1. Both appellants contend the evidence does not support the court’s finding on the section 12022.1 allega tions. James contends the court erred by editing his spontaneous statement to police to eliminate its exculpatory content. In addition, James…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. FosselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Bunnell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. KaramanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re LittlefieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. DakinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. People v. BariesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. People v. WalkkeinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API