Legal Opinion

Suarez v. Ro-Mar Terminal Warehouse Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 24, 1993No. 1—91—3338PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman

Plaintiff Juana Suarez appeals the trial court’s dismissal with prejudice of defendant Ro-Mar Terminal Warehouse Co., Inc. (RoMar), pursuant to a motion under section 2—619(a)(9) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 110, par. 2—619(a)(9)).

The trial court dismissed Ro-Mar because its alleged agent, Leonel Garcia, had been previously dismissed by reason of Supreme Court Rule 103(b) (134 Ill. 2d R. 103(b)) for failure to exercise due diligence in obtaining service upon Garcia.

Plaintiff acknowledges that under the doctrine of Towns v. Yellow Cab Co. (1978), 73 Ill. 2d 113, 382 N.E.2d 1217, and its progeny…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Towns v. Yellow Cab Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Lasko v. MeierIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Burton v. PerryIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Barth v. Board of Education of City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Holda v. County of KaneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. John Bachenski v. Mark Malnati, Flash Cab Company, and John HawkotteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API