Legal Opinion

Field v. Burr

California Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1900No. L. A. No. 650Published

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Luden Shaw, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

Appeal from a judgment for intervenor in a suit for the recovery of personal property levied upon hy defendant, as sheriff, under attachment in favor of plaintiff against third party.

The findings are unusually full and explicit, hut in "the conclusions of law the word “plaintiff” is inadvertently used for “intervenor,” which is the ground urged for reversal. (Dougherty v. Ward, 89 Cal. 81.)

We recommend that the judgment he affirmed.

Gray, C., and Haynes, C., concurred.

For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment is affirmed. McFarland, J., Temple, J., Henshaw, J.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dougherty v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890