Legal Opinion

The People v. Birket

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1930No. 19982. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant in error, the People of the State of Illinois, for the use of the Dime Savings and Trust Company, as conservator of the estate of Katie R. Birket, insane, began suit in the circuit court of Peoria county in an action of debt upon the bond of Arthur T. Birket, Sr., as conservator of the estate of Katie R. Birket, insane, on which bond the Detroit Fidelity and Surety Company was surety. Birket was defaulted, the surety company filed the general issue and a special plea, there was a hearing before the court without a jury, judgment was rendered in favor of defendant in error for $7500,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morley v. Town of MetamoraIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Hough v. HarveyIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Fogarty v. ReamIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of RumoroAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Trustees of Schools v. American Surety Co. of New YorkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  3. Amendola v. LeoniAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Foltz v. HutsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
  5. The People v. BallanceIllinois Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API