Legal Opinion
Jenkins v. Haaland
District Court, D. Utah
Decided November 29, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00385Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH JENKINS, et al., MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION v. Case No. 2:21-cv-00385-RJS-DAO HAALAND, et al., Chief District Judge Robert J. Shelby Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg Defendants. Now before the court is Plaintiffs’ “Motion for Reconsideration, and to Stay Issuance on Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order.”1 For the reasons explained below, the Motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND On June 22, 2021, pro se Plaintiffs Mary Carol M. Jenkins and Angel Kane filed a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Servants of the Paraclete v. DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Kevin K. Ogden v. San Juan County, Farmington Police Department, Aztec Detention Center, State of New Mexico, and Las Vegas Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Raymond J. Van Skiver Alma L. Van Skiver v. United States of America and John DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.