Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mutual Life Ins. v. Phinney

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 26, 1896No. 274Published

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the District of Washington.

1Dissent

GILBERT, Circuit judge

(dissenting). The decisions of the supreme court, referred to in the opinion of the majority of the court, establish beyond question that it is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court; but I am unable to concur in the view that it is essential to the filing of the writ that the indorsement of that fact be entered thereupon by the clerk.

At common law, the file was a thread or string or wire upon which writs and other papers in courts were fastened and filed for safekeeping and for ready reference. To file a paper meant to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Powers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Carroll v. Centralia Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Colchen v. NindeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Peterson v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
  5. Bishop v. CookNew York Supreme Court · 1850

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API