Legal Opinion · Dissent

Blocker v. Patch

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 27, 2006No. 06-6033MNPublished

1Dissent

McDONALD, Bankruptcy Judge,

dissenting.

I agree with the majority’s conclusion that a debtor inflicts a willful and malicious injury on a creditor under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6) if she knows with substantial certainty that her actions will result in that injury. I do not agree, however, that when reviewing the summary judgment record in the light most favorable to Debt- or that there are no material issues of fact in dispute so that Blocker is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. I, therefore, respectfully dissent.

I would begin by noting that the analysis of whether a person commits an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co. v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Valencia v. Reardan-Edwall Sch. Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. Valencia v. Reardan-Edwall School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API