Legal Opinion

Harleysville Insurance v. Wozniak

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 1985No. 03179PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*359BECK, Judge:

In this appeal we are confronted with an issue of first impression concerning the interaction of Section 305 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Workmen’s Act)1 and Section 204 of the Pennsylvania No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act (No-fault Act)2 where an employee has been injured in the scope of his employment by a vehicular accident and the employer has not provided workers’ compensation coverage. Under these circumstances is the injured worker’s or the employer’s no-fault carrier primarily liable for coverage?

Employer-appellee John Wozniak failed to carry…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wagner v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Turner v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Woytek v. Benjamin Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Motley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Ellisor v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Temple v. MILMONT FIRE CO.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. McGilley v. Chubb & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Vann v. School District of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Williams v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Liberty v. Adventure Shops, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API