Legal Opinion

State v. Moss

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 29, 2007No. 1 CA-CR 05-0306PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 The State appeals the trial court’s pretrial order precluding the State’s expert toxicologist from testifying to the results of tests of Defendant’s blood performed by non-testifying "witnesses and from offering opinions based in part on the test results. The trial court concluded that permitting this testimony from the State’s expert would violate Defendant’s constitutional right to confront the witnesses against him. We agree and therefore affirm.

I

¶ 2 Defendant Troy Richard Moss was charged with two counts of aggravated assault, two counts of endangerment, one…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. State v. EllisonArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. HydeArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Sergeant JOHN R. WILLIAMSON, JR.Army Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
  2. State v. MossCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. United States v. HarcrowCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  4. United States v. HarcrowCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  5. United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API