Legal Opinion

Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 26, 1982No. Appeal, No. 3138 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Atlantic Richfield Company (Atlantic) has appealed from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirming a referee’s order awarding benefits to Robert G. McFall.

*67On July 22, 1980, Atlantic discharged the claimant from his employment as an asphalt operator for excessive absenteeism. During the year of 1980, the claimant had a record of eleven days of absenteeism. The claimant applied for unemployment compensation benefits and the Office of Employment Security denied the application on the ground that the claimant’s discharge was for willful misconduct.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nyzio v. Lee Tire & Rubber Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Spicer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Manor v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Pauline v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fitzhugh v. New Mexico Department of Labor, Employment Security DivisionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Love v. Heritage House Convalescent CenterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Bortz v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Beene v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment & Training ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Beene v. REVIEW BD. OF IND. DEPT. OF EMP. & TRAINING SERV.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API