Pittsburgh Palisades Park, LLC v. Pennsylvania State Horse Racing Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
Judge SMITH-RIBNER.
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to affirm the State Horse Racing Commission’s order granting Pres-que Isle a license to conduct thoroughbred horse racing without requiring a review of the application of Presque Isle Downs, Inc. pursuant to the Commission’s newly adopted comparative review process. I note the majority’s conclusion that Pittsburgh Palisades failed to preserve any right to participate in an administrative *68hearing addressing only the merits of Presque Isle’s application and that the Commission’s denial of Pittsburgh…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Department of Environmental Resources v. Rushton Mining Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- R.M. v. Pennsylvania Housing Finance AgencyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Moyer v. Berks County Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Cashdollar v. STATE HORSE RACING COM'NCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- MEC Pennsylvania Racing, Inc. v. Pennsylvania State Horse Racing CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.