Sun Ship, Inc. v. Hidalgo
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on defendants’ and intervenor-defendant’s joint motion for summary judgment and plaintiff’s and intervenor-plaintiff’s oppositions thereto. Since there is no genuine dispute as to facts material to the resolution of the claims raised by the plaintiffs, 1 summary judgment is appropriate. For the reasons more fully set forth below, the Court grants summary judgment to defendants 2 and dismisses this action.
This action was commenced by Sun Ship, 3 and later joined in by QSD, 4 to enjoin performance of a Navy…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Kentron Hawaii, Ltd. v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Joseph Curran, Individually and on Behalf of All the Members of the National Maritime Union of America, Afl-Cio v. Melvin R. LairdCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Airco, Inc. v. Energy Research and Development Administration, and Cryogenic Technology, Inc., InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sun Ship, Inc. v. LehmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Monument Realty LLC v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Maryland, Inc. v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
- Prudential-Maryland Joint Venture Co. v. LehmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
- Cray Research, Inc. v. Department of NavyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.