Legal Opinion

WATER WORKS BD. OF CITY OF BIRMINGHAM v. Barnes

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 30, 1983No. 81-774PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Water Works Board of the City of Birmingham (The Board) appeals from a final judgment of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County declaring a three-zone rate schedule adopted by the Board for water sold by meter measurement and all fire hydrant charges to be unlawful and unreasonable, and permanently enjoining the Board from the collection of charges pursuant to that schedule.

The issues raised on this appeal are as follows:

1. Did the trial court err in substituting its judgment for the Board's with regard to the lawfulness of a three-zone rate schedule?

a. Should the trial court have presumed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Montgomery v. GreeneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Wilkey v. State Ex Rel. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. City of New Haven v. New Haven Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  4. City of Gadsden v. DownsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. City of Montgomery v. GreeneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Water & Wastewater Board of Madison v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. United Council of Loxley, Inc. v. City of LoxleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API