Legal Opinion

State v. Rolling

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1985No. 84-757PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrivosha, C.J.

This is the fourth appearance of this matter in this court. Initially, the appellant, Walter W. Rolling, was charged in a five-count information and convicted. The facts are more fully set out in State v. Rolling, 209 Neb. 243, 307 N.W.2d 123 (1981) (Rolling I), where we affirmed the convictions, and need not be repeated here. In Rolling I we noted plain error in that the sentences imposed by the district court were contrary to the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2221 (Reissue 1979) and therefore invalid. We set aside the sentences and remanded the cause to the district court with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. RollingNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Gates v. HowellNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Jurgensen v. AinscowNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State v. RollingNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Muller Enterprises, Inc. v. GerberNebraska Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rolling v. GrammerDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1987
  2. State v. ForalNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. JensonNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API