Stroud v. Glover
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff sued defendant, alleging damages for breach of contract. Defendant, a real estate broker, and plaintiff, a salesperson, had entered into a contract under which plaintiff was *260entitled to commissions upon the sale of certain real estate. Defendant maintains that the contract was subsequently terminated, and plaintiff is not entitled to the commissions at issue. The parties stipulated that had the contract not been terminated and had plaintiff continued to act as a listing salesperson, she would have earned $1,803.29 on four real estate transactions. The district court, affirmed by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stark v. Kent Products, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Sanford v. LuceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
- Soloman v. Western Hills Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Gary Boat Club, Inc. v. OselkaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Reith v. University Housing Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stillman v. GoldfarbMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Traffic Transport Engineering, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Remes v. HollandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Robert Williams v. Jagbir SranMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- Stroud v. GloverMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982