Vendome v. Vendome

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Balkin, J.), dated March 24, 2006, as denied her motion, in effect, for summary judgment determining that the prenuptial agreement did not waive, limit, preclude, or affect her right to equitable distribution of the increase in value of the defendant’s property during the marriage.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The parties’ prenuptial agreement provided that each party waived any right “that he…