Legal Opinion

Phœnix Iron Works Co. v. Mullen

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 28, 1904No. Appeal, No. 27PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal, No. 27, April T., 1904, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., June T., 1903, No. 220, affirming judgment of justice of the peace in case of Phoenix Iron Works Company v. J. S. Mullen. Appeal from judgment of justice of the peace. Error assigned was in affirming the judgment of the justice of the peace, •

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from the judgment of the common pleas affirming the judgment of an alderman and ex officio justice of the peace, which was brought before that court by certiorari. The 22d section of the Act of March 20, 1810, 5 Smith’s Laws, 161, provides that “ the judgment of the court of common pleas shall be final on all proceedings removed as aforesaid (by certiorari) by the said court and no writ of error shall issue thereon.” The law in this particular was not changed by the Act of July 7, 1879, P. L. 194, extending the jurisdiction of justices to the sum of $300 —…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Murdy v. McCutcheonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  2. Fowler v. EddySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  3. Crumley v. Crescent Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Palmer & Co. v. LacockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  5. Pennsylvania Pulp & Paper Co. v. StoughtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Huntington & Broad Top Mountain Railroad v. FlukeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Sweitzer v. EmertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Adams v. BergeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Home Protective Ass'n v. ReeseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Minogue v. Ashland BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API