Legal Opinion

Ingrassia v. Thompson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 30, 2003No. 4D02-20Published

1Opinion of the CourtMay, J.

The defendant filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus, alleging that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise the trial court’s restriction of defense counsel’s questioning on voir dire as an issue on direct appeal. We agree that counsel was ineffective in failing to raise this issue and grant the petition. The defendant shall be permitted a belated appeal related solely to this issue.

The defendant was charged with two counts of indecent assault and two counts of a lewd or lascivious act in the presence of a child. He was found guilty of one count of lewd and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Joiner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. Dobbert v. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Johnson v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  5. Lavado v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API