Legal Opinion

United States v. Barndollar & Crosbie, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 1, 1948No. 3513PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

The United States instituted this action against Barndollar & Crosbie, Inc., a corporation, hereinafter referred to as the *794taxpayer, Federal National Bank of Shawnee, Oklahoma, hereinafter referred to as the bank, and J. F. Buck, president of the bank. The claim pleaded was that the taxpayer owed insurance contribution taxes and unemployment taxes, together with penalty and interest thereon, in the aggregate amount of $3,217.20; that the bank and Buck received and had in their custody funds and other property belonging to the taxpayer; that notice of the levy was filed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Glass City Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Illinois Ex Rel. Gordon v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Citizens State Bank of Barstow, Tex. v. VidalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  4. Cannon v. NicholasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  5. Illinois Ex Rel. Gordon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wolverine Insurance Company v. PhillipsDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1958
  2. National Surety Corp. v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Randall v. ColbyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1961
  4. United States v. PaladinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1982
  5. United States v. BrodsonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API