Legal Opinion

Moody v. Seaman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1881PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Wayne. Complaint for forcible entry and detainer. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Mrs. Seaman, the defendant in error, commenced summary proceedings to recover possession of land, claiming the right of possession as tenant in dower, and guardian of her infant children. She was, at the time of her marriage to Mr. Seaman, widow of John W. Pardee, who had owned the land during his life. The defendant below claimed in his own testimony to have gone into possession under a verbal agreement of sale, for a price of six hundred dollars which was to be paid by payments of seventy dollars a year, but which, as he showed, had not been • paid except by some early payments about ten…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Proctor v. BigelowMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Bryan v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Crane v. O'ReileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zickler v. Union Bank & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Gage v. SanbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Delaney v. ManshumMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Judd v. FairsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. People v. Van PeltMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API