Cali v. Mustafa
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*701Contrary to the Supreme Court’s determination, the plaintiff Giovanni Cali (hereinafter Giovanni) failed to satisfy his prima facie burden of establishing his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Viewing the evidence submitted in support of the plaintiffs’ motion in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party (see Fundamental Portfolio Advisors, Inc. v Tocqueville Asset Mgt., L.P., 7 NY3d 96, 105-106 [2006]; Marine Midland Bank v Dino & Artie’s Automatic Transmission Co., 168 AD2d 610 [1990]), there is a triable issue of fact as to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Fundamental Portfolio Advisors, Inc. v. Tocqueville Asset Management, L.P.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. Dino & Artie's Automatic Transmission Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- King v. WashburnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Simmons v. CanadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Burnett v. ReisenauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Gardella v. Esposito Foods, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Myles v. BlainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Roman v. A1 Limousine, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.