Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided June 18, 1948No. 5579PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HULEN, District Judge.

Memorandum Under Rule 52, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as Amended, 28 U. S.C.A. following section 723c.

Plaintiff by complaint in two counts seeks judgment for $5,171.61, proceeds of an insurance income certificate issued to Charles R. Smith. Defendant was. named contingent payee in the income certificate and on death of Charles R. Smith received from the insurance company the amount here in controversy in settlement of the income certificate. Plaintiff bases her claim on the terms of a will executed by Charles R. Smith under the provisions of which, it is alleged,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Priedeman v. JamisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  2. Nance v. HilliardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API