Legal Opinion · Dissent

Reed v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1959No. 41175Published

1Dissent

Hall, J., Dissenting:

With deference I am impelled to dissent from the conclusion of the majority in this case and I do so not because I think the appellant is innocent but because I think that the decision of the Court has the effect of repealing Sec. 1691, Code of 1942, which is as follows: “The accused shall be a competent witness for himself in any prosecution for crime against him; but the failure of the accused, in any case, to testify shall not operate to his prejudice or be commented on by counsel.”

By Instruction No. 1 given the State the first portion of the above section of the Code…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Buckley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Woods v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Vails v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Pigott v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API