Reed v. State
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Dissent
Hall, J., Dissenting:
With deference I am impelled to dissent from the conclusion of the majority in this case and I do so not because I think the appellant is innocent but because I think that the decision of the Court has the effect of repealing Sec. 1691, Code of 1942, which is as follows: “The accused shall be a competent witness for himself in any prosecution for crime against him; but the failure of the accused, in any case, to testify shall not operate to his prejudice or be commented on by counsel.”
By Instruction No. 1 given the State the first portion of the above section of the Code…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Buckley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1885
- Woods v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1890
- Vails v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
- Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1907
- Pigott v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.