Legal Opinion

People v. Chenault

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 2014No. Docket 146523 and 146524PublishedCited by 139 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCormack, J.

In this case we consider the proper test for applying the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Brady v Maryland, 373 US 83; 83 S Ct 1194; 10 L Ed 2d 215 (1963). In People v Lester, 232 Mich App 262; 591 NW 2d 267 (1998), the Court of Appeals adopted a four-factor test that added a requirement of defendant diligence to the traditional Brady test. Neither the Supreme Court of the United States nor this Court has endorsed this element.

We hold that a diligence requirement is not supported by Brady or its progeny. Thus, we overrule Lester and reaffirm the traditional three-factor Brady test.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by139 opinions

  1. People v. SollowayMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State v. Bethel (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. People v. HenryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. People v. CainMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  5. People of Michigan v. Vicki Renee DickinsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API