People v. Chenault
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcCormack, J.
In this case we consider the proper test for applying the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Brady v Maryland, 373 US 83; 83 S Ct 1194; 10 L Ed 2d 215 (1963). In People v Lester, 232 Mich App 262; 591 NW 2d 267 (1998), the Court of Appeals adopted a four-factor test that added a requirement of defendant diligence to the traditional Brady test. Neither the Supreme Court of the United States nor this Court has endorsed this element.
We hold that a diligence requirement is not supported by Brady or its progeny. Thus, we overrule Lester and reaffirm the traditional three-factor Brady test.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by139 opinions
- People v. SollowayMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. Bethel (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
- People v. HenryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. CainMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
- People of Michigan v. Vicki Renee DickinsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.