Legal Opinion

Shur v. Shur

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided October 3, 1956No. 4934Published

1Opinion of the Court

Crumlish, J.,

We have before us for disposition, a petition and rule for payment of alimony pendente lite, counsel fees and costs in an *271action in divorce a.-v. m., and a second petition and rule for additional alimony and counsel fees.

The complaint in this divorce action was filed by plaintiff husband on November-5, 1952. Defendant wife was then, as now, a resident of Baltimore, Md. After service was made upon her she consulted a lawyer in her city, who in turn engaged Philadelphia counsel to represent her in the court here. The latter counsel entered his appearance for defendant on November…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brong v. BrongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Hanson v. HansonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Rothman v. RothmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Albrecht v. AlbrechtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Bredbenner v. BredbennerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API