Legal Opinion

Toney v. Haskins

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 19, 1980No. CA 80-222PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Judge.

The procedural morass which gives rise to this appeal yields an issue which is easier to decide than the facts are to describe. Basically, the question presented is whether the appellant should have been allowed to present an equitable counterclaim which was closely related to the main action and which arose after the issues had been joined in the circuit court. We hold the counterclaim should have been allowed and the entire matter transferred to chancery, and thus the case is remanded for that purpose.

In May, 1977, the appellant Toney, a realtor, purchased land from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. H. E. McConnell & Son v. SadleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  2. Belding v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  3. Cherokee Carpet Mills, Inc. v. Worthen Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  4. Shinn v. First Nat. Bank of HopeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  5. Owens v. Bill & Tony's Liquor StoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Toney v. HaskinsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Arkansas Iron & Metal Co. v. First National Bank of RogersCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Speight v. SpeightCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API