Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Bank of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 29, 1944PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CAFFEY, District Judge.

The defendant moves to dismiss the complaint. The plaintiff was the co-beneficiary and co-remainderman of a testamentary trust of which the defendant was the trustee.

The complaint seeks a money recovery from the trustee for breach of trust duties. There had been a judgment in the Supreme Court, New York-County, settling the account of the trustee and releasing it from further liability. This was entered pursuant to a stipulation between the beneficiaries and the defendant (complaint, paragraphs 4, 5 and 6). The settlement agreement has been carried out (complaint,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crouse v. . McVickarNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Berger v. LasotNew York Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Curtis v. Dunkirk Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Griffith v. Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API