Legal Opinion

Cauley v. Godwin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 22, 1960No. 38440PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

A purported acknowledgment of service in the following language is not an acknowledgment of service of the bill of exception: “Due and legal notice of the within bill of exceptions is hereby acknowledged and it is further agreed that the contents of this bill of exceptions are true and correct.” It is only an acknowledgment of notice of a bill of *414exception to be submitted to the judge for certification. Such a writ of error will be dismissed on motion. Code Ann. § 6-911. Cleveland v. Wacaster, 186 Ga. 662 (198 S. E. 708); Knight v. Georgia Power Co., 95 Ga. App. 289 (97 S.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. Riegel Textile Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  2. Cleveland v. WacasterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Knight v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Newman v. American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API