Legal Opinion

Giesler v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1963No. 35419PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment seeking to have declared unconstitutional an ordinance of the city of Omaha purporting to regulate the doing of business on Sunday. The plaintiffs were the owners of eight separate drug stores in the city of Omaha. Two parties intervened in the action, one the owner of a gasoline filling station and the other the owner of a drug store. The city of Omaha was the sole defendant in the original action and in the petitions in intervention.

The petition and the petitions in intervention asserted that the Sunday closing ordinance, ordinance No. 21945 of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gibson v. Koutsky-Brennan-Vana Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Ellis v. NilsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Plattsmouth Loan & Building Ass'n v. SedlakNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Snyder v. CollierNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State v. CoughranSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kansas Bankers Surety Co. v. HalfordNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Interiano-Lopez v. Tyson Fresh MeatsNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Roll v. Stanton-Pilger Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Miller v. HarrisNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Werner v. WernerNebraska Supreme Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API