State v. Brown
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendant was convicted, in a court tried case, of possession of cocaine, a Schedule II Controlled Substance in violation of § 195-017 RSMo Supp.1973, and of violation of the Habitual Criminal Act, § 556.280 RSMo 1969. For the reasons set- out herein the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
If we are to expedite the ever increasing number of cases presented for our consideration we must have the cooperation of counsel. The simple rules of the Supreme Court regarding appellate practice, and in particular 84.04, must be followed. This rule is equally applicable to civil and to criminal…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. ShumateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Graff v. MontileoneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MorrowMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. MacKeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. HutchensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. GarrettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. TsiboukasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.