Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. Ruston

This case and the case of Chicago, Rock Island & Gulf Railway Co. v. Neubert, 248 S. W. 139, this day decided, arose out of the same transaction.

The questions presented in both cases by the first and second propositions in each are identical.

The third proposition urged in this case is that the court erred in not submitting the following special charge:

“You are instructed in considering special issue No. 1, submitted to you by the court, that false imprisonment is the willful detention of another against his consent; that is, that the detention must be knowingly and intentionally done and…